The internationalization of a brand does not always follow the same pattern.
"Both approaches are valid and have a significant impact on brand strategy, market entry methods, and long-term market positioning."
1. Proactive Motives: Internationalization as a Strategic Growth Tool
Proactive motives arise from internal strategic planning, not as a reaction to external factors. Companies actively enter international markets because they recognize opportunities or want to leverage competitive advantages.
Typical proactive motives:
-
Strategic growth objectives: expanding revenue and market share
-
Leveraging existing competitive advantages: technology, brand, processes
-
Innovation and scaling opportunities: new markets offer learning potential and cost benefits
-
Global branding & thought leadership: positioning as a top international brand
Example: A fintech startup plans from the outset to expand into EU markets to establish unified platform solutions for cross-border payments.
2. Reactive Motives: Internationalization as a Response to External Influences
Reactive motives arise in response to external events or market changes. Companies are essentially “forced” to enter new markets to minimize risks.
Typical reactive motives:
-
Competitive pressure: competitors enter the home market or new technologies change the competitive landscape
-
Regulatory changes: restrictions in the home market, new compliance requirements
-
Market stagnation or declining demand
-
Customer requirements: international clients or partners need global solutions
Example: An established SaaS company expands into South America after demand in the home market stagnates and new competitors gain market share.
3. Strategic Differences Between Proactive and Reactive Motives
| Feature | Proactiv | Reactiv |
|---|---|---|
| Driver | Internal strategy, growth | External market conditions, risks |
| Risk | Market uncertainty, investment effort | Missed opportunities, competitive pressure |
| Focus | Expansion & opportunities | Protection & damage limitation |
| Brand impact | Strengthens global branding | Protects existing brand |
4. Success Factors for Both Approaches
Whether proactive or reactive, the following factors are critical:
-
Clear international brand strategy: consistent positioning across all markets
-
Market research & data analysis: understanding opportunities and risks in new markets
-
Regulatory compliance: early consideration of KYC/KYB/AML and local regulations
-
Market entry method & timing: joint ventures, partners, or own subsidiaries depending on market conditions
-
Internal resources: personnel, budget, and processes must meet international requirements
5. Conclusion: Flexibility and Strategic Thinking
Internationalization is a double-edged sword: proactive motives drive growth and market leadership, while reactive motives protect market positions and reduce risks. Companies that combine both approaches and align their brand clearly on an international level are the most successful in the long term.
Quellen:
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (2009). The Uppsala Internationalization Process Model Revisited: From Liability of Foreignness to Liability of Outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431.
Cavusgil, S. T., Knight, G., Riesenberger, J. R. (2017). International Business: The New Realities. Pearson.
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (2002). Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Harvard Business Review Press.
Peng, M. W. (2022). Global Business. Cengage Learning.
Stratoor Consulting Blog (2024). Motive zur Internationalisierung einer Marke. https://www.stratoor.com/stratoor-consulting-blog/post/motive-zur-internationalisierung-einer-marke
Submit Your Comment